See reviews >

3D Printing Technology and Intellectual Property Infringement

James Banks's profile picture

James Banks - Trainee Solicitor

Published
Article reviewed by Jack Diggines and Richard Meehan .

3D Printing Technology and Intellectual Property Infringement

The rapid evolution of 3D printing technology has transformed industries but also raised significant intellectual property (IP) concerns.

As unauthorised reproductions become easier to produce, patent holders, trademark owners, and copyright holders face increasing legal challenges.

Our Technology and Commercial Litigation Lawyers explore the key IP risks of 3D printing and the legal remedies available to rights holders.

The Development of 3D Printing Technology

3D printing, also known as additive manufacturing, involves a machine laying down successive layers of material, such as plastics, fused to form a 3-dimensional product.  

CAD (Computer-Aided Design) files hold the data, such as relevant dimensions, required for the 3D printer to construct the desired output.

Since the first patent was filed in 1986 for a historic form of 3D printing, technological advancements have significantly reduced the financial cost of 3D printers and expanded 3D printing to consumers and commercial businesses.

Equally, technological advancements in 3D printing have also broadened the capabilities of this technology, including in the aerospace industry for the creation of jet engine parts and organ transplants, as demonstrated in 1999 when scientists at the Wake Forest Institute for Regenerative Medicine used a 3D-printed bladder in an organ transplant.

In light of recent technological advancements and anticipated future advancements in 3D printer capabilities, commercial parties should be wary of potential Intellectual property (IP) infringement issues that may arise.

Speak To Our Experts

Intellectual Property Infringement

In November 2018, the UK Intellectual Property Office (UK IPO) published a study on3D printing and intellectual property futures’.

However, at present, there is no specific legislation in the UK governing the relationship between IP and 3D printing.

Consequently, IP owners should consider existing IP infringement laws when enforcing their IP rights against infringing individuals and/or companies.

Sign Up For The Latest Technology News

IP Infringement

Patent Infringement

Patents provide inventors with a monopoly over their inventions. However, only a patent's proprietor, co-owner or exclusive licensee can claim patent infringement.

Considering the frequent use of 3D printers to construct parts for products, for example, in the aerospace industry, companies seeking to bring a claim for patent infringement for the construction of spare parts should be mindful of the Court’s distinction betweenmaking(an infringing act under the Patents Act) andrepairing(which is not an infringing act).

The Schutz (UK) Ltd v Werit UK Ltd (2013) UKSC 16 decision explained that the distinction betweenmakingandrepairingis a question offact and degree”.

As a result, the likelihood of patent infringement following the construction of spare parts by 3D printers will likely turn on the facts of the case.

Download Our Claimant's Guide to Patent Infringement

Patent Infringement v2

Trademark Infringement and Passing Off

Trademarks can include names, logos and certain shapes.

Consequently, 3D printing technology can also give rise to potential trademark infringement claims where the output of a 3D printer includes a registered mark.

Trademark Infringement under the Trade Marks Act 19994 occurs when the infringer:

  • Uses a sign which is identical to another person’s trade mark in respect of identical goods;
  • Uses a sign which is identical to another person’s trade mark, in respect of similar goods, and there is a likelihood of confusion;
  • Uses a sign which is similar to another person’s trade mark. In respect of identical or similar goods, and there is a likelihood of confusion; and/or
  • Uses a sign that is identical or similar to another person’s trademark, has a reputation in the UK, and takes unfair advantage of or is detrimental to the character of the trademark's reputation.

Despite rapid technological developments in 3D printing, the potential brand damage caused by poor-quality 3D printed products may justifiably lead to trademark owners seeking an injunction, delivery up of goods and/or damages against the infringing party.

Because trademark registration for 3D shapes is difficult, a claim for passing off is more likely to be applicable where 3D printers have created similarly shaped products.

In order to demonstrate passing off, a claimant must demonstrate that:

  • the goods have goodwill attached to them
  • there has been misrepresentation, which leads to the public believing that the goods belong to the claimant and
  • that damage has been caused to the claimant.

Contact Our IP Dispute Lawyers

Trademark Infringement and Passing Off

Copyright Infringement

It has also been suggested that the CAD files containing the necessary data to instruct a 3D printer may equally be subject to copyright protection.

The potential extension of copyright to CAD files is particularly valuable for users of 3D printing technology since copyright protection is granted automatically and lasts for the lifetime of the creator plus 70 years.

Copyright infringement claims may, therefore, apply to 3D printing technology if a CAD file is copied or distributed without the developer’s consent.

Find Out More About Our Copyright Infringement Service

Copyright Infringement v2

The Growing Importance of IP Protection in 3D Printing

The 3D printing industry has experienced significant technological advancements in recent decades.

Given these advancements, Intellectual Property rights are anticipated to become increasingly valuable in the manufacturing and scientific development industries.

Interested parties should, therefore, seek legal advice to protect their IP and enforce any existing IP.

Contact Our Intellectual Property Dispute Solicitors

Protecting your intellectual property in the evolving world of 3D printing is crucial to safeguarding your rights and innovations.

Contact our expert Commercial Litigation and IP lawyers today for tailored legal advice on enforcing and securing your intellectual property.

01619414000

James Banks's profile picture

James Banks

Trainee Solicitor

James joined as a Trainee Solicitor at Myerson in 2024 and is currently in his first seat within the Commercial Litigation department.

Prior to joining the firm, James graduated from Durham University with a First Class Honours LLB. He is currently completing the SQE qualification with BPP University in Manchester.

About James Banks