See reviews >

Fans Look Back In Anger As The CMA Confirms It Will Investigate The Dynamic Pricing Of Oasis Ticket Sales

Olivia Whittaker's profile picture

Olivia Whittaker - Associate

Published
Article reviewed by Carla Murray.
5 minutes reading time
Fans Look Back In Anger As The CMA Confirms It Will Investigate The Dynamic Pricing Of Oasis Ticket Sales v2

Dynamic pricing, also known as real-time pricing, is the practice of adjusting the price of a product quickly and flexibly in response to market demand. For example, it may increase the price of a product after it has been placed in an online shopper’s basket.  

Dynamic pricing practices can risk being deemed unfair under the UK’s consumer law regime.

While consumers can benefit from low prices when demand for a product or service is low, such as out-of-season flight tickets or hotel bookings, there has been growing outcry, particularly about ticketing for live sports and music events, that these practices unfairly inflate prices for consumers.

In this blog, our Commercial Solicitors explore the implications of dynamic pricing practices, particularly in light of the CMA’s investigation into Ticketmaster’s handling of Oasis reunion tour ticket sales.

Contact Our Commercial Solicitors

Oasis outcry

The most recent widespread criticism of algorithmic dynamic pricing has been regarding Oasis’ ticket sales for the band’s long-anticipated reunion tour via the online ticketing platform Ticketmaster.

Fans have complained that they ended up paying significantly more than expected: in some cases, prices more than doubled, from less than £150 to over £350 per ticket.

Oasis responded to the outcry by issuing a statement to PA Media confirming that the band did not know dynamic pricing would be used and that they had left decisions on ticketing and pricing entirely to their promoters up to their promoters and management.

Additional tour dates are to be made available by an invitation-only ballot.

Sign Up For The Latest Commercial Law News

Oasis outcry

CMA investigation

On 5 September 2024, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA), the UK’s competition regulator, announced that it would investigate whether Ticketmaster has breached consumer protection law.

Ticketmaster calls itself the world’s biggest entertainment ticketing platform and is estimated to hold over 50% of the market share in the UK’s ticketing industry.

Ticketmaster is one of the official sellers for the Oasis tour and has said that the Oasis tour promoters set the ticket pricing policy, not Ticketmaster.

The BBC has noted that the three promoters for the Oasis reunion tour are all linked to Live Nation Entertainment Inc (Live Nation), the US company that owns Ticketmaster. Earlier this year, the US government issued an antitrust lawsuit against Live Nation because it unlawfully exercised its monopoly over the ticketing industry in the US.

The CMA’s investigation into Ticketmaster will examine whether when selling Oasis tickets:

  • Ticketmaster engaged in unfair commercial practices;
  • Buyers were given clear information to explain that the tickets could be subject to price rises and how this would operate, and
  • Buyers were put under pressure to buy tickets within a short period at a higher price than they expected to pay.

The CMA is at the initial stage of its investigation and is gathering information from various sources, including Ticketmaster, the event organisers, Oasis’ management, and fans who bought or tried to buy tickets on Ticketmaster’s platform.

Meet Our Commercial Team

What are the relevant rules around consumer pricing?

In 2005, the Unfair Commercial Practices Directive (2005/29/EC) (UCPD), concerning unfair B2C practices, was incorporated into UK law via the Consumer Protection from Unfair Trading Regulations 2008 (CPUT). 

CPUT protects consumers in B2C transactions and contains a list of banned, illegal, and aggressive commercial practices.

Unless otherwise agreed, goods and services must be provided for a reasonable price. While traders are free to set their prices, they must provide consumers with adequate information about their prices and how they calculate them.

Before a consumer enters into a contract, they must have received information on the total price of the products (including any taxes) or, at the very least, how the final price will be calculated if the final price cannot be provided in advance.

This includes providing information on additional charges, such as booking fees, that might apply to their order.

Traders must not provide false information or deliver an overall impression likely to deceive or mislead a consumer about the price (even if the information provided is correct).

The key advice is that traders must be transparent in their dealings with consumers and give clear and accurate information about the price consumers will pay.

Speak To Our Commercial Lawyers

What are the relevant rules around consumer pricing

What pricing practices might be considered to be unfair commercial practices?

The European Commission’s guidance on UCPD is still applicable to CPUT and focuses on the following pricing practices:

  • Dynamic pricing – where prices are adjusted depending on demand. Surge prices on Uber and the rest of the ridesharing sector are a good example.
  • Price discrimination – where traders apply different prices to different groups of consumers for the same goods or services.
  • Personalised pricing – where traders personalise prices for specific consumers based on online tracking and profiling data. This can be deemed an aggressive practice, for example, where personalised advertising is so persistent that it impairs the consumer’s judgment.

Drip pricing is another potentially unfair strategy common in the transport, food delivery and hospitality industries, where the total price ends up being much higher than advertised due to the addition of ‘hidden’ but necessary extras.

A key issue with many of these practices is that consumers are unaware that these strategies will apply to their purchases.

Consumer data is being used to inform these strategies, which is a problem. Traders must ensure they uphold the principle of transparency and allow consumers to opt out of the processing of their data.

Learn More About Commercial Law

What pricing practices might be considered to be unfair commercial practices

Conclusion

As the Oasis ticketing outcry has demonstrated, while dynamic pricing offers a short-term windfall where the keenest customers pay more for a product, it could carry other long-term costs, such as damage to your brand and loss of goodwill.

Sarah Cardell, Chief Executive of the CMA, reiterated that it was important fans are treated fairly when they buy tickets and that the CMA welcomed the government’s recent announcement that it will consult on measures to provide stronger protections to consumers in the ticketing sector, wherever they buy their tickets.

Contact Our Commercial Solicitors

If you want to bolster your existing pricing terms or ensure that your B2C platform complies with UK consumer law, our Commercial Solicitors can help.

Contact us on:

01619414000

Olivia Whittaker's profile picture

Olivia Whittaker

Associate

Olivia has experience acting as a Commercial solicitor, and specialises in advising on e-commerce and consumer rights. Olivia also has experience advising on technology contracts, including SAAS subscription terms, app and platform EULAs and in respect of the supply of managed IT services.

About Olivia Whittaker >