The main drivers for creating the 2016 forms were to:
- Simplify payment processes;
- Incorporate the certain elements relevant to public sector procurement; and
- To include reference to the Construction Design Management 2015 Regulations.
The 2016 updates are reforms to the 2011 JCT forms rather than large scale re-drafts, so whilst they do not include changes to the overall allocation of risks and obligations, there are a number of key changes to be aware of.
i) Payment provisions
Arguably, the most significant changes have been made to the payment terms and these are likely to have the biggest impact.
The intention behind these changes is to implement the government’s fair payment charter, to simplify and consolidate some of the drafting.
The changes are also intended to speed up the payment process throughout the contractual chain so that all levels of the chain from the main contractor down to sub-contractors and sub-sub-contractors are paid within the same 30-day period.
To reflect the fair payment principles, changes have been made to the interim payment due dates.
This includes the introduction of a common interim valuation date that applies throughout the contract chain with the intent that all valuations are assessed and processed against the same period.
Also, the payment period is now co-ordinated in the main contract and sub-contracts so that there is sufficient time to process the applications and payments downstream to sub and sub-sub-contractors.
Of course, the payment provisions in all commercial construction contracts are subject to the Housing Grants, Construction and Regeneration Act 1996, more commonly known as the Construction Act.
Where the payment terms in a construction contract do not comply with the Construction Act the contractual payment terms are effectively replaced by the legislative payment regime.
The JCT 2016 forms have consolidated the payment notice requirements of the Act, with the intention of providing certainty with regards to payment and to help contractors and developers avoid falling foul of the Construction Act.
Anyone moving to the JCT 2016 forms needs to ensure that they and their project teams are fully aware of their obligations set out in the revised payment provisions.
Please see our more detailed blog post on the changes to payment provisions in the JCT 2016 forms for more information.
ii) CDM Regulations
The 2016 JCT forms have been updated to reflect the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2015, which replaced the Construction (Design and Management) Regulations 2007. The key change resulting from the updated legislation is the replacement of the role of CDM co-ordinator with that of the principal designer.
iii) Performance bonds and parent company guarantees
The 2016 JCT forms include provisions allowing for the contractor to provide a performance bond and /or a parent company guarantee if the developer requires, although there are no forms provided and no sanctions for a failure to comply.
iv) Collateral warranties and third party rights
The 2011 JCT forms dealt with collateral warranties and/or third party rights from the contractor to beneficiaries, but only collateral warranties from sub-contractors to beneficiaries. The 2016 JCT forms include provisions requiring sub-contractors to provide third party rights to beneficiaries, although there is little evidence that this provision has been widely used to date.
v) Insurance
There are widespread amendments to the insurance provisions but they are generally not substantive.
The most important changes relates to Option C, which is one of the insurance options in the JCT contracts. Option C is used in the case of alterations of or extensions to existing structures and this provides for the developer of a project to insure both the works and existing structures to the works do not apply. However, the 2016 JCT forms have been amended to allow alternative solutions for existing structures to be adopted.
An example will help to illustrate the usefulness of this provision. Where a tenant renting part of a building wants to undertake works to the part they rent, the risk of damage to other parts of the building must be insured against during the tenant’s works.
A tenant is unlikely to be able to afford insurance cover for the rest of the building during their works. The drafting of the JCT 2016 forms allow the contractor to rely on its annual cover for any liability arising out of damage to existing structures during their works (obviously this subject to agreement of the contractor’s insurer).
This change acknowledges that many developers are in fact tenants and therefore not responsible for insuring entire buildings.
Please see our more detailed blog post on the changes to insurance provisions in the JCT 2016 forms for more information.