In cases where the parties’ financial resources do not exceed their needs, the court may include and assess the value of property obtained prior to the marriage in their total evaluation of the parties’ finances.
The judge in the case of Rossi v Rossi [2006] EWHC 1482 (Fam) provided the following summary of a court’s approach:
“The court will decide whether it [non-matrimonial property] should be shared and, if so, in what proportions. In so deciding, it will have regard to the reality that the longer the marriage, the more likely non-matrimonial property will become merged or entangled with matrimonial property. By contrast, in a short marriage case, non-matrimonial assets are not likely to be shared unless needs require this.”
As a result, there is no definite answer as to what will happen to non-matrimonial property on divorce. This depends on each case’s individual facts, including the amount of the non-matrimonial property, the needs and resources of each party and the length of the marriage.
Another important factor is whether the parties kept their wealth distinct from their joint wealth and whether the non-matrimonial property was kept separate from the couple’s finances throughout the marriage.