Disadvantages of an EOT for the selling shareholders
As the available tax reliefs have strict qualifying conditions attached to them, there is a risk that the tax reliefs could be lost if a disqualifying event occurs before the end of the fourth tax year following the end of the tax year of disposal, this was until the Autumn Budget the end of the following tax year after the disposal of shares.
To mitigate this risk, the trust or the company will usually undertake not to take steps that would result in the occurrence of a disqualifying event and possibly even indemnify the selling shareholders against the loss of any tax reliefs.
It is common for the acquisition of shares by an EOT to be funded out of future profits of the company and it therefore may be a number of years before the selling shareholders receive the entirety of the proceeds of the sale.
There are, however, debt finance and future refinance opportunities available, which may help with this and reduce the timescales for payment of the purchase price.
The principal disadvantage for any selling shareholders who are not seeking a full exit upon sale to the EOT is the loss of control over the company. The selling shareholders should, therefore, be comfortable with this transition of power.
A shareholders’ agreement can help, however, provided that it does not indirectly preserve control with the selling shareholders.

Disadvantages of an EOT for the employees
There are a few disadvantages for the employees, although employees who foresee themselves as future business owners may feel that there is less scope for this under the EOT ownership structure.
However, it is still possible to award employees with direct share ownership or offer share options under the EOT ownership structure, provided that doing so does not result in those persons having a controlling stake.